The Way this Legal Case of a Former Soldier Regarding Bloody Sunday Ended in Case Dismissal
Sunday 30 January 1972 stands as among the deadliest – and significant – days in multiple decades of violence in the region.
Within the community where events unfolded – the legacy of that fateful day are displayed on the structures and embedded in people's minds.
A civil rights march was held on a chilly yet clear afternoon in Londonderry.
The march was opposing the practice of imprisonment without charges – holding suspects without legal proceedings – which had been implemented after an extended period of conflict.
Military personnel from the specialized division killed multiple civilians in the neighborhood – which was, and continues to be, a strongly nationalist area.
One image became especially memorable.
Pictures showed a clergyman, the priest, waving a blood-stained white handkerchief while attempting to protect a group transporting a teenager, the fatally wounded individual, who had been mortally injured.
Journalists documented much footage on the day.
Historical records features Fr Daly explaining to a media representative that soldiers "appeared to shoot indiscriminately" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no reason for the gunfire.
That version of the incident wasn't accepted by the first inquiry.
The first investigation concluded the military had been attacked first.
During the negotiation period, the ruling party established another inquiry, in response to advocacy by family members, who said the first investigation had been a cover-up.
In 2010, the findings by Lord Saville said that overall, the military personnel had discharged weapons initially and that not one of the casualties had posed any threat.
The contemporary Prime Minister, the leader, issued an apology in the House of Commons – declaring fatalities were "unjustified and unacceptable."
The police commenced examine the matter.
One former paratrooper, referred to as Soldier F, was brought to trial for killing.
Indictments were filed concerning the deaths of James Wray, in his twenties, and 26-year-old the second individual.
The defendant was further implicated of trying to kill Patrick O'Donnell, other civilians, further individuals, an additional individual, and an unknown person.
There is a legal order maintaining the defendant's anonymity, which his lawyers have claimed is required because he is at threat.
He stated to the examination that he had solely shot at people who were carrying weapons.
This assertion was rejected in the final report.
Information from the inquiry was unable to be used immediately as evidence in the legal proceedings.
In the dock, the defendant was hidden from public with a privacy screen.
He made statements for the initial occasion in court at a hearing in that month, to answer "not responsible" when the charges were presented.
Kin of those who were killed on Bloody Sunday journeyed from Londonderry to the courthouse each day of the proceedings.
A family member, whose brother Michael was died, said they understood that listening to the trial would be difficult.
"I visualize all details in my memory," the relative said, as we examined the key areas referenced in the trial – from the location, where the victim was fatally wounded, to the adjoining the courtyard, where the individual and William McKinney were died.
"It reminds me to where I was that day.
"I participated in moving my brother and place him in the ambulance.
"I relived each detail during the testimony.
"Despite enduring everything – it's still worthwhile for me."